Revising employee invention rules: treatment of past inventions and rewards

1 Changes to the rules and improvements in their operation

First divide the matters the revision is intended to resolve into those requiring changes to the provisions and those that can be addressed by improving operation of the existing system. Changes to reward formulas, caps, eligibility conditions, or the mechanism by which the company acquires rights require consideration of the relationship with the previous rules. By contrast, problems such as missing evaluation materials, delayed handovers between departments, or a failure to record which rules were applied call first for a check of whether the current provisions are being followed.

However, even changes to forms or procedures go beyond operational improvement if they affect employees' rights, for example by making submission of new materials a condition of payment. Identify the changes, their reasons, and the inventions and employees affected.

2 The inventions and benefits to which the new rules apply

The effective date of the new rules is separate from the scope of application of individual provisions. Begin by distinguishing provisions that give the company rights from provisions determining rewards for acquisition of those rights. Different versions of the rules may apply to ownership and to benefits or procedures for the same invention.

For ownership, establish whether the right to obtain a patent for an employee invention is to pass from the employee to the company or to vest in the company from completion of the invention. For initial vesting, a provision under which the company acquires the right at that time must have applied validly to the person concerned before completion. Check the timing and conditions of acquisition. A later revision cannot cause a right that has already arisen to have vested originally in the company. For past inventions, establish ownership when the right arose and any subsequent succession or assignment.

For changes to rewards, distinguish benefits relating to rights the company will acquire in the future from benefits relating to rights already acquired. That distinction alone, however, does not determine the applicable formula or payment conditions. A right to remuneration or benefits may already have arisen even if no calculation or payment has yet been made. Check the relationship between rights under the applicable law and the content and payment timing of benefits under previous rules or individual agreements, and consider the legal basis for applying the change. Merely stating the intended coverage in the new rules does not necessarily validly amend existing benefit terms.

Check the applicable rules and the applicable legislation separately. Under the amendment effective April 1, 2005, the rules on remuneration differ according to whether succession to the right or another relevant event occurred before or after commencement. The amendment effective April 1, 2016 introduced initial vesting in the company and the concept of reasonable benefits, but did not automatically replace ownership or remuneration claims that had already arisen. Check completion of the invention, succession to the right or other relevant events, and the arising of a claim separately. Do not determine the applicable law solely from the patent filing date or the date of the present payment.

After checking the validity and scope of the changes, determine through transitional provisions the matters that will continue to be handled under the previous rules. If only administrative procedures are being updated while benefit terms remain unchanged, make that distinction clear. There is no need to bring every matter processed after the effective date under the new rules.

Checks for each type of change

Change	Decisions on the scope of the new treatment	Relationship with previous arrangements to check
Replacing succession or assignment with initial vesting	The acquisition mechanism for future inventions and when it begins to apply.	Treatment of rights already in existence, including ownership when they arose and subsequent succession or assignment.
Changing a reward formula or cap	Whether the change covers only rights acquired in the future or also benefits for rights already acquired.	Individual agreements, uncalculated amounts for past performance, calculated but unpaid amounts, and continuing benefits.
Changing payment timing or benefits on retirement	Which benefits change first and the treatment of current and former employees.	Previous eligibility conditions, payment deadlines, and promised benefits.
Changing evaluation or consultation procedures	Treatment of newly commenced and ongoing procedures.	Carrying forward notices, evaluations, and hearings of views already completed.

The persons covered and effective dates must be checked as discussed above. This table organizes the review of proposed changes; it does not establish that each change is legally permissible.

3 Effects of revised rewards on existing benefits

Rewards for the same invention may change not only through different coefficients or caps but also through changes in the sales or licensing revenue included, deductible expenses, or the assessment period. The proposed revision should make it possible to explain which elements produce differences from the previous standards.

For evaluation materials, check whether the information required by the new formula can be obtained for the relevant past periods. Also consider whether the approach would undervalue inventions solely because historical records are unavailable. If additional materials must be submitted, clarify whether this is merely a change of form or an additional condition for payment.

When changing payment timing, distinguish uncalculated amounts relating to past performance, calculated but unpaid amounts, and amounts to be calculated by reference to future performance, and check their relationship with existing payment deadlines. For a change to a lump-sum benefit on retirement, verify the basis and scope for replacing the previous benefits and consider how future benefits should be valued. Leaving the company does not by itself extinguish a claim that has already arisen. Examine the effects on benefits for each condition being changed, including arrangements for contacting and notifying current and former employees.

4 Consultation and explanation compared with the legal effect of changed terms

Employee invention rules may be treated as work rules depending on their content, even if set out in a separate document. For each provision being changed and the persons affected, check the rights recognized by previous rules and individual agreements and consider whether rules governing disadvantageous changes to working conditions apply. Conducting consultation or similar procedures when determining benefits does not necessarily permit changes to existing rights or benefit terms. Distinguish participation in consultation from consent to a change of terms.

For reasonable benefits under current law, guidelines issued by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry under the Patent Act identify matters to consider when assessing whether benefits granted under the rules are unreasonable. When revising benefit standards, consider consultation during preparation of the standards, disclosure of the standards, and hearing the person's views on an individual benefit determination in light of those guidelines.

Identify the terms being changed and the persons and matters covered, and prepare materials explaining the differences before and after revision. Retain the versions of explanatory materials, the persons covered, views received, and responses, and connect these records with the assessment of the revision's legal effect.

5 Applicable rules and records when the revision takes effect

At commencement, check the following matters, including where some cases will continue under the previous rules.

Can the applicable version of the rules and transitional provisions be identified for each invention, benefit, and procedure, without relying solely on the effective date of the rules as a whole? Are matters still under evaluation, amounts determined but unpaid, and continuing benefits distinguished, with the applicable standards and next steps settled for each? Can ongoing hearings of views and objections be carried forward through procedures consistent with previous notices, and have the contact point and person responsible for responses been assigned? Can individual decision records be traced to the rules applied, individual agreements, evaluation materials, and reasons for the calculation, including reasons for exceptional treatment? Can the previous rules and records of explanations and consultation at the time still be consulted, without being lost when materials are replaced after revision, so that inquiries concerning former employees can also be addressed?

A revision requires an assessment of how far existing rights and benefit terms have become established, followed by a decision on the scope in which the old and new rules apply. We advise on the legal constraints and effects of proposed changes, applicable provisions and transitional arrangements, explanations and consultation concerning revisions, and their initial application. Please also see our intellectual property practice.

Related article: Intellectual property remediation during IPO preparation: reviewing rights, contracts, rules, and practices (remediation of past handling of rights identified during IPO preparation).

Contact

Making an inquiry

Please tell us the outline of the situation, any notice you have received and its date, and any deadline you are working to.

Contact Form

Related information

Related explainers and practice areas

Intellectual property, IT and data: overview

Individual guides, according to the situation, on disputes over rights, the removal of trade secrets, and system development and the management of data.

Intellectual property, IT and data (practice areas)

Our practice areas covering the acquisition and use of intellectual property rights and responding to infringement, contracts relating to IT and systems, and the handling of data.

This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice on any specific matter. Please consult us regarding your specific situation. The content is based on the laws and regulations in effect as of the date of the last update.